翻訳と辞書 |
Archibald v. Braverman : ウィキペディア英語版 | Archibald v. Braverman ''Archibald v. Braverman'', (1969), was a case decided by the California Court of Appeals that first ruled that visual perception of an accident was not a necessary prerequisite to recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress under the criteria enunciated in ''Dillon v. Legg''. The holding in ''Archibald'' was later overruled by the 1989 case ''Thing v. La Chusa''.〔(Sulaiman, Yohann. ''Torts and Emotional Distress.'' Knol.com )〕〔''Thing v. La Chusa'', 48 Cal. 3d 644, 668〕 ==References==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Archibald v. Braverman」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|